Over the
last
decade, there have been changes in the design and appearance of buildings around the world. Some people believe that we should construct to look only in traditional styles to preserve their cultural heritage. In my opinion, I disagree entirely with Linking Words
this
view because the culture is dynamic, and Linking Words
also
Linking Words
this
would discourage innovations.
Culture is not static. The current look of structures in the countryside is not the same centuries ago. People build houses with clay or plant leaves, and today it is with cement or bricks. Linking Words
For example
, in 1884, houses Linking Words
but
in rural areas were made of mud and bamboo. If we stop building with modern designs, we will limit our abilities to develop culture, and (used of soaps or cleaning agents) having a substance (an abrasive or filler) added to increase effectiveness
built
this
would hinder growth.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, new ideas should be encouraged, and people should be allowed to construct buildings to have a modern appearance. Linking Words
Also
, the new look helps us to differentiate the cities from rural areas. Linking Words
Moreover
, these innovations result from tackling challenges face some regions. Linking Words
For instance
, in Lagos, skyscrapers are built to help overcome the limited land available. And if the introduction of new designs Linking Words
were discouraged
, it would be impossible to solve Suggestion
was discouraged
this
problem.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
some people think that to protect our cultural identity, the government should enforce designs of structures in traditional style, I believe that Linking Words
this
would harm our society. That means Linking Words
this
would discourage people from developing new ideas, and there would be limited culture development.
Linking Words
jennyokuofo11