World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Looking back at the past, we often seem to notice that war and

mililtary

of or relating to the study of the principles of warfare

military

tensions were highly pronounced under the situations when a man was commanding power.

Hence

, it can be argued that women holding positions of power might be a viewed as a better alternative for establishing peace. I strongly agree with

this

statement. The following essay will highlight the primary two reasons for

favoring

promote over another

favouring

the fairer sex for a better world. The reasons are their non impulsive nature and motherly instincts.

Firstly

, women are not slaves to their impulses. Ladies, in

general tend

Accept comma addition

general, tend

to be more rational. They think decisions through, and do not jump into conclusions as compared to males, that are more or less often driven by their

implulsive

proceeding from natural feeling or impulse without external stimulus

impulsive

thinking. When a woman takes a decision, there is a smaller probability of her being dictated by her gut feeling.

For example

, a study by Colombia university demonstrates that 68 % of females were willing to listen to a given situation before reacting, as compared to 45 % of males.

Secondly

, the feminine has an innate motherly quality.

This

virtue allows her to focus on the creative aspects of life. As compared to men, who

are

Accept comma addition

are, however

however

, known to jump directly into a direct combat. A prime example is our past. If we analyse all the major wars that happened, it was always a man leading the armies. Whether it is the battle of Plassey or the

First

World War. Contrary to

this

, history has evidence of women employing diplomatic ways to resolve an issue. A classic example is of Queen Cleopatra of Egypt, who formed alliances with her enemies.

Hence

, Egypt flourished under her reign and completed its golden age. In conclusion, due to a woman's non impulsive feelings and motherly nature

,

Accept space

,

I agree that female leadership can be seen as a better option to promote a peaceful world.