Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty. Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. Do you agree or disagree?

Third

world countries often require

series

Suggestion

a series

of help from developed countries. It is a debated issue whether financial aid should be given or other types of help. I agree that financial aid solves

majority

Suggestion

the majority

a majority

of their

problem

Suggestion

problems

than other forms of help with these points. Financial assistance given to poorer countries helps to alleviate poverty and enables a better standard of living.

For instance

, with money at hand various issues are tackled

such

as unemployment

,

Accept space

,

in

this

case factories and companies are built, people are employed and wages are paid.

Also

,

health system

Suggestion

the health system

is improved to render adequate services to people.

However

, most developing countries are faced with corrupt leaders who do not have the interest of the people at heart.

Therefore

, they embezzles these funds,

consequently

, the masses continue to suffer.

On the other hand

, rendering other forms of help

such

as food relief, giving educational materials and provision of clean water has undisputedly helped so many developing countries like Sudan, who has been

recieving

get something; come into possession of

receiving

food relief from Europe for a long time.

Thus

ensuring that the masses are well fed. The drawback to

this

form of help is that there is a limit to what can be achieved and all the basic needs might not be solved. In summary, financial aid helps a country to improve its economy if funds are properly monitored and disbursed rather than

recieving

get something; come into possession of

receiving

other

any of various alternatives; some other

another

type of help which might not go a long way like the former in meeting the countries need.