Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant’s past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

In England and Australia, juries are not granted access to personal criminal records in order to protect the accused’s policy.
However
, some lawyers believe that having certain information about defendants could allow them to pronounce more accurate verdicts. I side with
this
view as it benefits both the bench and people who breach the laws for self-
defense
(military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
defence
. On juries’ side, they may have a more objective judgment if they have past records of the criminal. Previous histories are necessary to decide the severity of punishment. They provide insights into social background, educational level and mental health which are vital to assess one’s dangerousness and
therefore
, the jury could judge the criminal more precisely.
For example
, repeat offenders
such
as serial murderers or rapists should gain a stringent
punishment whereas
Accept comma addition
punishment, whereas
people who commit crime under
unfavorable
not encouraging or approving or pleasing
unfavourable
circumstances should be treated more leniently. Self-defenders
also
benefit from
this
practice. When their records are taken into considerations, they are less likely to be misjudged.
For instance
, a girl may commit murder in order to protect herself from being raped. In
this
case, if there was no evidence to prove her self-
defense
(military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
defence
, she would be sentenced to life imprisonment or death penalties.
However
, a clean history may be a persuasive proof that she didn’t murder intentionally,
thus
, punishment on her would be reduced. In conclusion, juries should be aware of
criminal’s
Suggestion
criminal
past records in order to make
judgment
Suggestion
a judgment
judgments
the judgment
without flaws.
This
is advantageous not only to the
jury but
Accept comma addition
jury, but
also
to people who commit crime for
defense
(military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
defence
.
Submitted by quynh.nhu.pham.2505 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: