In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree?

Owing to the harm smoking causes passive individuals,

as a result

of

this

, a handful of countries have taken up the responsibility to ban smoking in public places. I strongly agree with

this

major step as it will reduce hospitalizations and improve general

health

.

To begin

with,

second

hand smoke which consists of carcinogenic components, has serious negative

health

consequences that could harm lives permanently and individuals could develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat

as a result

of inhalation. Research has found that banning smoking in public places can reduce heart attack hospitalizations by 50%.

In addition

, the lingering

odor

any property detected by the olfactory system

odour

of stale cigarettes in open places tends to linger

on

Suggestion

in

people's hair and clothes and takes longer to fade even while the offending party has left. Another point to consider is the right of the employer to provide a safe and healthy environment for its employees. Studies have shown that smoke free laws that prohibit smoking in public places like bars and restaurants help improve the

health

of workers and the general population.

Also

, smokers do not adequately dispose

off

connects a noun with the preceding word

of

the cigarette butt which has resulted in the littering of attractive buildings and the surrounding landscape.

Furthermore

, smoking in open facilities promotes a negative impact to the young ones which are admittedly learning from the elder ones. In conclusion, despite the fact that smokers are aware of the disastrous consequences of smoking,

however

, it is clear that individuals should be made to exit the facility if they need to smoke because

this

would improve the

health

of thousands of people.