Traditionally,
through a written
test
, which evaluated their
knowledge
and ability.
This
method,
however
, has been
by many teachers who claim it is an old and inaccurate way to
test
the
student
's
knowledge
.
As a result
, there is a growing debate, how to evaluate properly the
student
's achievement.
Using a closed or an open set question
test
, is probably the safest way to compare
knowledge
between the tested students. Because the questions are similar to all students, and as a consequence the answers are the same, it is easy for the examiner to check the tests and grade them
accordingly
.
Furthermore
, these
of tests are excellent when we are interested in assessing
knowledge
from several schools at the same time. To illustrate, every year in Israel, a closed set question
test
is ishave the quality of being; (copula, used with an adjective or a predicate noun)
being used to evaluate elementary school students across the entire country in mathematics, history and
englishan Indo-European language belonging to the West Germanic branch; the official language of Britain and the United States and most of the commonwealth countries
language. Based on these scores, the local education system is being financed by the
gpvernmentthe organization that is the governing authority of a political unit
.
In contrast
to the above mentioned, formal tests might be difficult and stressful to some students, which may affect their ability.
This
is especially true for students who suffer from ADHD or mental conditions, that prevents them from concentrating for long periods. Due to that,
although
these students know the tested material, they are still getting poor
test
results which affect their education gravely. These
propblema state of difficulty that needs to be resolved
can be prevented through the use of, other methods,
such
as oral examination, end
semeterone of two divisions of an academic year
final work, or an oral presentation which
the anxiety associated with formal tests.
In my opinion, formal tests are not a good way to evaluate a
student
's
knowledge
because it only tests what we remember, and not what we
understantknow and comprehend the nature or meaning of
.
we are tested in history,
for example
, remembering the location and the time of a specific event during the Vietnam war, might give us a
goothaving desirable or positive qualities especially those suitable for a thing specified
test
score,
however
it will not
test
if we
understantknow and comprehend the nature or meaning of
the moral and historical consequences of it. By using other methods of evaluation,
such
as an oral lecture about the consequences of the war, or
wrttingthe act of creating written works
an assay about the effects of the war, a teacher can really know if the
student
the material.
In conclusion, formal tests, in my opinion,
ara unit of surface area equal to 100 square meters
enotnegation of a word or group of words
the best method to evaluate
student's achievementsSuggestion
the student's achievements
and understanding. Other means,
such
as a final
semsterone of two divisions of an academic year
work, can
asessevaluate or estimate the nature, quality, ability, extent, or significance of
if the students
truelyin accordance with truth or fact or reality
understand the material
or just memorized it.