Some children find some subjects such as Maths and philosophy too difficult to learn, so some people argue that these subjects should be optional rather than compulsory. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a long-standing debate if difficult subjects should be compulsory or optional. To a larger extent, I believe these subjects should be kept as a criterion of graduation, and in the following essay, my point of view will be explained. Undoubtedly, given the fact that everyone has their special talents and interests, they should have a chance to pick what they would like to study. To shed more light on

this

issue, research shows that more than 70% of the science students believe that participating history lecture is a waste of time, which clearly illustrate the view of the children.

However

, in the modern age, all-rounded education is essential.

Although

pupils may not enjoy certain subjects, each subject provides specific purposes. As an instance, when Maths and

philosophy establish

Accept comma addition

philosophy, establish

our critical thinking skills and logic system, history provides evidence and background information for us to analysis social issues.

Furthermore

, serving as a part of philosophic education, students should learn to face difficulties

instead

of running away. If people are not good at something, they should take a step forward and improve themselves. Making the courses as mandatory can give them a

push but

Accept comma addition

push, but

not let them flee. In short, to a larger extent, I disagree with the view that the demanding subjects

should be put

Suggestion

should put

into the optional category. Even the pupils have various gifts,

multidiscipline

education is necessary at present and children should be taught to conquer the obstacles but not escape from that.