The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amounts of money. This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

FUNDS UTILITISED IN THE REFURBISHMENT OF ANTIQUE BUILDINGS IN CITY CENTERS IS HIGH,

ALTHOUGH

SOME THINK IT WOULD RATHER BE USED FOR NEW INFRASTRUCTURES, I AM OF THE OPINION THAT MAINTAINING

THIS

OLD STRUCTURES IS THE WAY TO GO IN A BID TO PRESERVE OUR CULTURE AND HERITAGE, BUILDINGS SHOULD NOT BE OVERLOOKED. ESPECIALLY IN A LEARNING ENVIRONMENT WHERE VISUALIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF MEMORIZATION .

Accept space

.

FOR EXAMPLE

, THE RUNNER UP OF EUROPEAN COLLEGES HISTORY DAY CHALLENGE GAVE A PRESENTATION OF THE MOST FAMOUS STATUE IN HER CITY SQUARE WHICH EARNED HER MORE MARKS THAN EVERYONE. FUTHERMORE, IT IS KNOWN THAT HISTORY AND HISTORICAL ARTIFACTS HAS COME TO BE A MAJOR PART OF A PLACE SYMBOLISM. ANOTHER POINT TO CONSIDER IS TOURIST ATTRACTION, SPENDING MONEY ON ANCIENT STRUCTURES IN A CITY CENTER WOULD PAVE A WAY FOR FOREIGNERS TO VISIT

THIS

PLACES AND HAVE REMARKABLE EXPERIENCES LEARNING ABOUT IT. CONCLUSIVELY, I BELIEVE THAT CHANNELING

THIS

FUNDS INTO THE RENOVATION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IS EFFECTIVE FOR CONSERVING HISTORY AND PROVIDING ENTERTAINMENT FOR TOURIST