Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are lots of poor countries all around the world who need help in order to solve the poverty.

However

, financial aid seems to be not so useful. I totally agree with the statement that developed country should find another

way

to support them.

First

of all, I believe that

money

just can’t resolve any problem. Even though it seems very generous to give financial help to pored countries, it is not. Actually, these

mon

ey sh

Suggestion

monies

moneys

ould be given back until a certain period of time. All of

this

makes the progress harder and slower.

For example

, one of the European countries - Greece, has been in a long crisis because of the

money

it owes.

Secondly

, effective methods have a great impact on solving economical problems.

In other words

, countries should create a plan involving practical ways of removing the poverty without so huge amount of

money

. In that

way

, they would be able to do it in the best possible

way

.

Thus

, the developed countries have unique methods by which they have succeeded so I think

that is

the thing they should show to the poorer country. To conclude, even developed countries had their problems at some point. They shouldn’t just give financial help - what they should do is to reveal their secrets for achieving success. Only in that

way

many countries would stop struggling with the poverty. Because our target is to help them, not to give them more and more loans which they would have to pay.