Families who do not send their children to government financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that supports universal education. To what extent do you agree .

These days, the increase in human

population

is creating a burden for major and small cities. While some people argue that to solve

this

problem

countryside

should be opened up to create more housing for people, but

on the contrary

some believe that the

countryside

should be preserved. I believe

countryside

should not be changed to accumulate more people because the consequence will affect the entire world.

Firstly

, I think that expanding cities to the

countryside

will cause irreversible damage to

nature

.If more people move to the

countryside

, a lot of green vegetation would need to be cleared to support their housing structure, new electricity grids, water pipelines and many more. Rather than exploiting the green cover, we could consider creating a

population

control measure.

For example

, China started with the world's

first

one child policy to combat exponential

population

growth.

This

not only would reduce stress on overcrowded cities in the future, but will

also

help to keep

nature

intact.

Moreover

, the

countryside

is the main source of agriculture produce and dairy. Putting pressure on

countryside

by reducing the amount of open area can cause tremendous pressure to provide food.

In other words

, if the production level of the farmers goes down, it can cause an inflation of basic food prices. So rather than solving a problem, we would end up creating more issues for the whole

population

.

Finally

, we should stop damaging the

nature

for short term gains and look towards alternatives to provide long term solutions. I believe

this

is the only way to coexist with

nature

.