Due to high unemployment rate in some countries, pupils should be offered only primary education and not secondary education since there is no jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people reason that

school

children should only acquire primary

education

and not secondary

as a result

of the high rate of unemployment in some countries. I,

however

, totally disagree with

this

point of view because children need s

econdary

Suggestion

the secondary level

level

of learning to compete for the few jobs available and

also

set up their business if they need to. To start with, the non-availability of adequate jobs in certain countries, means that people need to be highly competitive in order to secure one, and the only way to do

this

is through a

cquisition

Suggestion

the acquisition

of secondary

education

.

In other words

, employers of labour, both government and private organizations, require more than p

rimary academic qualification.

Suggestion

a primary academic qualification

For instance

, a recent advertisement placed for employment in some countries, boldly indicated a minimum qualification of secondary

school

certificate.

This

implies that

school

children should be made to go beyond primary

level

of learning in order to stand a chance of getting a job.

Furthermore

, secondary

education

equips the children with adequate skills to set up their private businesses. For one thing, in countries where there a

re

Suggestion

is

no much w

orks

Suggestion

work

for people to do, they often resorted into self established works. They,

therefore

, need to learn the knowledge from a secondary

level

of

education

as those kinds of skills are not usually taught at primary

level

. In conclusion, while the non-availability of jobs has led some people into thinking that

school

pupils shouldn't study beyond primary

school

, I totally disagree as

this

qualification is not enough to make them competitive and be self-employed.