In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

It is true that
video
surveillance has become commonplace in many cities in recent years. While I understand that critics may see
this
as an invasion of privacy, I believe that there are more benefits than drawbacks. There are two main reasons why people might disapprove of the use of
video
cameras in public places. The
first
objection is that these cameras invade our privacy, in the sense that we are constantly being watched by the authorities or by private security firms. Many people find
this
intrusive and feel that the recording of their movements is a form of state control that curtails their individual freedom. The
second
argument against the proliferation of CCTV cameras is that they are being used as an alternative to police officers patrolling the streets. If
this
is indeed happening,
then
it is unlikely that members of the public will feel safer. In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I believe that the use of
video
cameras to monitor public areas is a positive measure. The key objective of
video
surveillance is to deter criminals and to prevent crime.
For example
, petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets are less likely to operate in parts of cities where they know that they are being watched. At the same time, when crimes are committed, the police can use
video
evidence to catch and prosecute offenders.
Therefore
, in my view,
video
cameras offer valuable support to police officers, and they make cities safer for inhabitants, workers and visitors alike. In conclusion, I would argue that the advantages of using
video
security systems in public places do outweigh the disadvantages.
Submitted by punnadatta on

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next: