Some people say it is manufactures and supermarkets responsibility to reduce the amount of packaing of products they sell and others say it us consumers responsibility to avoid buying products with too much of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is thought by certain individuals that demolishing consumption of

wraping

the covering (usually paper or cellophane) in which something is wrapped

wrapping

or goods protecting

meterials

the tangible substance that goes into the makeup of a physical object

materials

is driven by the

way

of consuming the

product

possess by the customers and the good's sellers.

How ever

Suggestion

However

, an important question in relation to

this

is how these differences are justified.

Therefore

, in my opinion, imposing the price of

wraping

the covering (usually paper or cellophane) in which something is wrapped

wrapping

materials which consists the ingredients:

plastic

and polythene prior to the durability has become timely need. On the one hand, consumers

differs

Suggestion

differ

from the manufactures because of the

way

of using the

package

Suggestion

packaged

product

. Customers are consuming the

product

and they

are easily throwing

Suggestion

have easily thrown

the packaging

product

to

Suggestion

into

the environment

.

Accept space

.

This

reason

often attribute packaging

Suggestion

often attributes, packaging

often attributes packaging

makers to

thing

an instance of deliberate thinking

think

twise

two times

twice

the

way

they are making them.

For instance

,

Accept space

,

milk bottles can be produced thinner or

corton

soft silky fibers from cotton plants in their raw state

cotton

rather than using

plastic

. Another reason that those packaging products would be advantageous that they are most cost effective for the customers. So

this

has reinforced the idea that if the prices of

plastic

and

polything

the work of making something smooth and shiny by rubbing or waxing it

polishing

polythene

products are increased, significantly customers will start to use environmental friendly products.

On the other hand

, some people claim that manufacturers and supermarkets having control over the packaging products they are making

.

Accept space

.

So

this

seems to have a good point

interms

Suggestion

in terms

of deciding the materials for the packaging products

.

Accept space

.

Also it

Accept comma addition

Also, it

is clear that increasing the packaging

product

cost would

bre

have the quality of being; (copula, used with an adjective or a predicate noun)

be

the feasible solution to identify the reason behind

this

problem. For an example, some countries

(

Accept space

(

UK

,

Accept space

,

USA) government has already imposed the prices of

plastic

bags to avoid the uses of the

manufactures

a business engaged in manufacturing some product

manufacturers

. So despite the fact that consuming and selling packaging products in terms of the deterioration can be justified as far as durability concerned.

There fore

Suggestion

Therefore

, increasing

thr

definite article

the

price of packaging products would be the feasible solution possess by the people who responsible for

this

. In conclusion, there is no doubt that consuming packaging products

interms

Suggestion

in terms

of the environmental friendless

is

Suggestion

are

here to stay,

suported

sustained or maintained by aid (as distinct from physical support)

supported

by the

way

of consuming and selling items.

Nevertheless

, the best

way

to deal with these issues driven on bias are best solved by increasing the price of

plastic

and polythene products.