some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. instead they should spend money for housing and road development. To what extent do you agree?

It is argued that refurbishing the old buildings in the cities should be curbed and, Alternatively, the public money must be used for developing residential areas and roads. I completely agree that spending the revenues for the construction of the public amenities over restoring of the longstanding buildings and describe their importance.
Firstly
, The growing number of people migrating to the cities for employment are resulting in parallel increase of slums in the urban areas and
this
must be prevented by providing homes
to
Suggestion
for
the poor. Centralised industrial
development
in the cities has given rise to a growth in urban population within a short time, inadvertently it
also
became a cause for the lack of basic amenities for the residents.
Such
areas often have poor hygiene and lack an organized drinking water supply, and make the residents prone to
plagues
Suggestion
the plagues
and the fire accidents. As an example, Dharavi, the largest slum in Asia is located in Mumbai City. Due to the carelessness of the rulers, the migrants from rural areas had to live in grave conditions.
Secondly
, the
development
of existing highways and laying new
roadways improve
Accept comma addition
roadways, improve
the connectivity between the cities and the surrounding areas. The growing industrialization demands
large number
Suggestion
a large number
of human resources, and having better transportation infrastructure facilitates more and more people commute to work without any hitch.
Moreover
,
such
development
catapults the economical growth and invites more investors to
setup
Suggestion
set up
their industries. The rapid growth of Hyderabad is a well-known example of it. To conclude, Investing in the housing and roadway
development
have far more benefits than improving the conditions of the age old buildings. Allocating funds for better living condition of ever increasing population and betterment in
quality
Suggestion
the quality
of the roads will benefit in the long run of the residents.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: