Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?

Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of

energy

as alternatives to fossil

fuel

. In my opinion,

this

could be seen as a progress for the following reasons.

First

, there is no arguing that producing

energy

from buried dead organisms lacks sustainability, which means

such

production could not guarantee the survival of humans in the long term. In fact, the consumption of

energy

generated from fossil

fuel

tends to accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate of exploitation,

this

valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other choices than seeking additional reserves

such

as nuclear power or hydroelectricity.

This

is a safe solution to the fear of

energy

scarcity and ensures the future development of the human race.

Second

, dependence on fossil

fuel

for worldwide

energy

supply would cause environmental degradation while using solar power,

for example

, is considered an ultimate choice of

energy

conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas emission and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment.

Such

suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans.

By contrast

,

this

would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited amount of inexpensive

energy

on

Suggestion

in

the long run. In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential

energy

sources to replace fossil

fuel

is obviously an important step forward.