The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. Do you agree or disagree?

The author of

this

topic makes an

assertion

that governments should use

money

Suggestion

the money

to build new public properties rather than restoring the old buildings. While some may argue that

this

assertion

holds true for all the cases, other may counter

this

assertion

with

different point

Suggestion

a different point

different points

of view. In my opinion,

this

assertion

does hold water. So, I agree with

this

proposal. The main point of

this

proposal is to invest

government

's

money

towards the new

constractions

the act of constructing something

constructions

construction

in major cities. As the population is significantly huge in the major cities around the world, these cities need more developed

communication

as well as new public housing. It is very natural that the number of vehicles in the main cities

are

Suggestion

is

large enough to increase the pressure in the

communication

service

and as

road

Suggestion

the road

is the main

communication

medium in these cities, Governments should invest more

money

in order to create new roads. Same goes for public

service

housing.

For instance

, according to

Times

Suggestion

the Times

of India,

Indian

Suggestion

the Indian government

government

will invest a good amount of

money

to create new public

service

buildings and 1

lakh

kilometer

a metric unit of length equal to 1000 meters (or 0.621371 miles)

kilometre

road in Delhi, Kolkata,

CHennai

a communist nation that covers a vast territory in eastern Asia; the most populous country in the world

China

and Mumbai

,

Accept space

,

by 2022.

Moreover

,

tax payers

someone who pays taxes

taxpayers

want to have better facilities in the means of

communication

and public

service

from their governments. As people of any country contribute a certain amount of

money

in the form of

tax

in order to help their countries

development

Suggestion

develop

, they want their

government

's

storng

having strength or power greater than average or expected

strong

steps to help them in the means of

service

and basic

communication

. The

government

is

respondsible

worthy of or requiring responsibility or trust; or held accountable

responsible

to justify its people's hard earn

money

by investing them towards the development of the

nation

.

In other words

, if they invest a good amount of

money

towards the development of roads, which is the basic means of

communication

, they can satisfy the

tax

payers.

In addition

, if they can build more public buildings which can solve the general problems of people, the

tax payers

someone who pays taxes

taxpayers

should not feel cheated by their

government

.

For example

, the Canadian

government

built many public buildings and roads during

last

ten years, the Canadian public elected same

government

in 2019 again because they are very much satisfied with the

service

by their governments.

However

,

the old

Suggestion

older

buildings hold the cultural value of

there

of them or themselves

their

nation

so in some cases they need to be restored. We can see any Country's heritage and unique

constraction

the act of constructing something

construction

constructions

through the

ancent

belonging to times long past especially of the historical period before the fall of the Western Roman Empire

ancient

ancients

properties of that

nation

. If they are destroyed, the country may

loose

fail to keep or to maintain; cease to have, either physically or in an abstract sense

lose

the fundamental

asthetics

relating to or dealing with the subject of aesthetics

aesthetic

aesthetics

. Because of

this

reason, it is better to restore the old buildings of a

nation

. To exemplify

this

, according to an

articale

nonfictional prose forming an independent part of a publication

article

published in L.

A

Suggestion

At

Times, Rome is

failed

Suggestion

failing

to impress tourists due to the lack of heritage properties since 2007. In conclusion, it can be reiterated that as our new generation need better facilities from their

government

,

money

should be invested in the building of new properties in the major cities around the world.