The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. Do you agree or disagree?

The author of
this
topic makes an
assertion
that governments should use
money
Suggestion
the money
to build new public properties rather than restoring the old buildings. While some may argue that
this
assertion
holds true for all the cases, other may counter
this
assertion
with
different point
Suggestion
a different point
different points
of view. In my opinion,
this
assertion
does hold water. So, I agree with
this
proposal. The main point of
this
proposal is to invest
government
's
money
towards the new
constractions
the act of constructing something
constructions
construction
in major cities. As the population is significantly huge in the major cities around the world, these cities need more developed
communication
as well as new public housing. It is very natural that the number of vehicles in the main cities
are
Suggestion
is
large enough to increase the pressure in the
communication
service
and as
road
Suggestion
the road
is the main
communication
medium in these cities, Governments should invest more
money
in order to create new roads. Same goes for public
service
housing.
For instance
, according to
Times
Suggestion
the Times
of India,
Indian
Suggestion
the Indian government
government
will invest a good amount of
money
to create new public
service
buildings and 1
lakh
kilometer
a metric unit of length equal to 1000 meters (or 0.621371 miles)
kilometre
road in Delhi, Kolkata,
CHennai
a communist nation that covers a vast territory in eastern Asia; the most populous country in the world
China
and Mumbai
,
Accept space
,
by 2022.
Moreover
,
tax payers
someone who pays taxes
taxpayers
want to have better facilities in the means of
communication
and public
service
from their governments. As people of any country contribute a certain amount of
money
in the form of
tax
in order to help their countries
development
Suggestion
develop
, they want their
government
's
storng
having strength or power greater than average or expected
strong
steps to help them in the means of
service
and basic
communication
. The
government
is
respondsible
worthy of or requiring responsibility or trust; or held accountable
responsible
to justify its people's hard earn
money
by investing them towards the development of the
nation
.
In other words
, if they invest a good amount of
money
towards the development of roads, which is the basic means of
communication
, they can satisfy the
tax
payers.
In addition
, if they can build more public buildings which can solve the general problems of people, the
tax payers
someone who pays taxes
taxpayers
should not feel cheated by their
government
.
For example
, the Canadian
government
built many public buildings and roads during
last
ten years, the Canadian public elected same
government
in 2019 again because they are very much satisfied with the
service
by their governments.
However
,
the old
Suggestion
older
buildings hold the cultural value of
there
of them or themselves
their
nation
so in some cases they need to be restored. We can see any Country's heritage and unique
constraction
the act of constructing something
construction
constructions
through the
ancent
belonging to times long past especially of the historical period before the fall of the Western Roman Empire
ancient
ancients
properties of that
nation
. If they are destroyed, the country may
loose
fail to keep or to maintain; cease to have, either physically or in an abstract sense
lose
the fundamental
asthetics
relating to or dealing with the subject of aesthetics
aesthetic
aesthetics
. Because of
this
reason, it is better to restore the old buildings of a
nation
. To exemplify
this
, according to an
articale
nonfictional prose forming an independent part of a publication
article
published in L.
A
Suggestion
At
Times, Rome is
failed
Suggestion
failing
to impress tourists due to the lack of heritage properties since 2007. In conclusion, it can be reiterated that as our new generation need better facilities from their
government
,
money
should be invested in the building of new properties in the major cities around the world.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next: