Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that having more police on the streets is best way to reduce and combat crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The perpetual criminal activities in some countries are extremely hard to handle nowadays. Some people advocate for more physical

presense

the state of being present; current existence

presence

of

police

on the streets as a solution for

this

uncontrollable situation. Though it might address

this

problem to some extent, Injecting more

police

personal

group of people willing to obey orders

personnel

on to

to on

onto

the public streets is simply not a viable solution,

beause

for the reason that; on account of

because

of

it's

of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"

its

cost. I believe that there are other measures like

survilence

close observation of a person or group (usually by the police)

surveillance

and gun control which are more efficient approaches to eradicate

crime

from being

infesting

Suggestion

infested

the society.

Firstly

,

Survilence

close observation of a person or group (usually by the police)

surveillance

is

a

Suggestion

an

economical option compared to mass incorporation of

police

on the

streetes

a thoroughfare (usually including sidewalks) that is lined with buildings

streets

. All it takes is installation of

camaras

equipment for taking photographs (usually consisting of a lightproof box with a lens at one end and light-sensitive film at the other)

cameras

in each and every corner of the street to get maximum ground coverage.

This

way, if some

crime

happens,

police

force can specifically target the location where the

insident

a single distinct event

incident

is being taken place, and address that issue

with in

internal to, not outside; located in the bounds of

within

minutes.

This

is

very efficient way

Suggestion

a very efficient way

to handle the unlawful activities happen on the streets.

Secondly

, Gun control is another strategy to put

out

of or belonging to us

our

arms from the hands of criminals, and

citzens

a native or naturalized member of a state or other political community

citizens

of society for that matter.

For instance

, In the US, many people got killed in recent times to gun violence, where

assult

close fighting during the culmination of a military attack

assault

asset

stryle

how something is done or how it happens

style

guns were used by normal citizens of society who never had a criminal record on them.

Had they not have

Suggestion

Had they not had

guns in their

hands which

Accept comma addition

hands, which

can spray hundreds of bullets in seconds,

mass execution

Suggestion

the mass execution

mass executions

of humans could have been

evoided

stay clear from; keep away from; keep out of the way of someone or something

avoided

evaded

. Countries like Australia, Netherlands and

India which

Accept comma addition

India, which

have stricter gun

countrol

power to direct or determine

control

laws are able to eliminate military style execution from

takening

very attractive; capturing interest

taking

place. In conclusion, We should be able to take measures that could eliminate the origins of the

crime

from the root level rather filling the streets with more

police men

a member of a police force

policemen

. In my perspective, beefing up the

presense

the state of being present; current existence

presence

presents

of

police

independently may not be a viable to

solution

Suggestion

solve

to eradicate the

crime

.