Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?

The protection of

wildlife

has become a frequent subject of debate with strong arguments for and against. Personally, I believe that humans are paying too much attention and allocating too many resources to

this

issue, as will now be explained.

Firstly

, if we allow any species to disappear,

this

is actually not a disaster. Some people may argue that

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

biology will be seriously affected if birds and wild

animals

are on the verge of extinction, but

this

is an exaggeration. Fossil evidence suggests that the mass disappearance of the dinosaur did not cause any harm to other species on the Earth but merely triggered the emergence of others

such

as the mammal.

Therefore

, we should not devote too much attention to the protection of

wildlife

.

Secondly

, public money is limited.

This

means that the national budget should be allocated to more urgent issues rather than expending too much

in

Change preposition

on

show examples

the conservation of wild

animals

and birds.

For example

, more resources should be diverted to medical research to find

out

Change preposition

apply

show examples

remedies for fatal diseases

such

as HIV and cancer, which may help to save thousands of lives in society.

Finally

, the government can simply protect

wildlife

by continuing campaigns to raise public awareness of the protection of

wildlife

habitats

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

or impose stricter punishments on activities that may harm wild

animals

. Any individual who hunts

wildlife

for food or for pleasure should be given a heavy fine, and

this

may discourage them from threatening the

life

Fix the agreement mistake

lives

show examples

of wild

animals

. In conclusion,

while

I do not refute the argument for the conservation of

wildlife

, I believe that it should attract less attention and fewer resources from the public.