Some people say that historical buildings should be knocked down while others say that they should be preserved. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Along with the development of technology and civilization, the world is changing at a fast speed. Every day, numerous new buildings have been constructed somewhere in the world.

however

Suggestion

However

, in spite of the increasing number of new buildings, there is a heated debate about whether we should knock down the historic buildings or not. The following paragraph will help

further

explain those two ideas. In terms of preservation, both views are understandable. For the people who agree to knock down the buildings, several reasons could support

this

idea.

First

of all, the facilities in the buildings are outdated and technology to construct buildings is not up to date neither, since the historic buildings have been designed a long time ago. Even though the building owner would like to elongate the buildings' using

time

objective case of they

them

, it will take more time and effort to renovate the building than tearing down them.

Secondly

, taking down the historic buildings would help the

city

plan better. Normally, the current

city

planning theory

has developed

Suggestion

develops

much more than in the past. In ancient times, people built a house does not come with a lot of reasons,

however

, in the present, the

city

would have lots of regulations in terms of the land use. Under

this

circumstance, historic buildings would not fit into the current

city

planning that easily. Knocking down the historic buildings for the

city

's future development is much reasonable and beneficial. But keeping the historic buildings is meaningful in some way because these buildings can reflect the

city

's past. Preservation would help

the young generation

Suggestion

younger generations

younger generation

the younger generation

understand the history of the

city

better.

Besides

, preserving the old buildings would help keep the

city

's unique identity and assist the tourists to know the

city

's culture

easier

Suggestion

easiness

. When I go to the new

york

the English royal house (a branch of the Plantagenet line) that reigned from 1461 to 1485; its emblem was a white rose

York

city

and take the empire building's elevator, I felt like living in the 18th century thanks to the preservation of the buildings' interior. There are both pros and cons to preserve historic buildings. Personally speaking, I am for the idea to knock down

the older

Suggestion

the old

building if the building does not have many meanings in the

city

's history. Only moving on without the past can help the

city

to develop

Suggestion

develop

faster and better. Tokyo in Japan is a good example, even though it has been bombed during WWII, the

city

has developed a more adaptive strategy for the

city

to get along with the new era.