In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In most of the countries, it is often thought by some that the construction of new railway tracks between cities is

indispensible

not to be dispensed with; essential

indispensable

;

however

, others think that a huge amount of financial resources ought to be used

on

Suggestion

for

improving current public transport system. In my opinion, I consider that the more budget should be allocated to commuting system, in order to improve the lives of

general public

Suggestion

the general public

.

Accept space

.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why some proponents propose that new railway lines are required between different regions.

To begin

with,

buliding

a structure that has a roof and walls and stands more or less permanently in one place

building

infrastructure is critical for the development of the domestic economy of any country.

In other words

, numerous goods can be transported to distant regions of the country to sell. In

this

way, not only the consumption of

things will

Accept comma addition

things, will

increase but

Accept comma addition

increase, but

also

the employment in that specific region will rise.

Thus

, it is completely clear that spending huge financial resources

is

Suggestion

are

necassary

absolutely essential

necessary

to give

boom

Suggestion

a boom

to economical condition of a nation. One the other hand,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

agree with those who argue that the investment

on

Suggestion

in

public

trasport

move something or somebody around; usually over long distances

transport

is of huge importance.

Firstly

, a huge number of commuters travel within cities on

daily basis

Suggestion

a daily basis

for study or official work which requires better transport facilities,

therefore

, money should be

spend

Suggestion

spent

to provide them

comfotable

providing or experiencing physical well-being or relief

comfortable

seats and low

fairs

an agenda of things to do

fares

in order to provide satisfaction.

Secondly

, it is the best way to promote public transport among citizens to reduce the usage of personal vehicles which is one of the main causes of rising

corbon

an abundant nonmetallic tetravalent element occurring in three allotropic forms: amorphous carbon and graphite and diamond; occurs in all organic compounds

carbon

levels in the air.

For instance

, Pakistan has recently invested

on

Suggestion

in

public

transpot

move something or somebody around; usually over long distances

transport

which has resulted in

effficient decrease

Suggestion

an efficient decrease

efficient decrease

inefficient decrease

of personal vehicles. In conclusion,

although

people have

diferent

unlike in nature or quality or form or degree

different

perspectives on allocation of government resources, I

belive

accept as true; take to be true

believe

that the improvement in general commuting system is critical for numerous

enviromental

of or relating to the external conditions or surroundings

environmental

aspects.