Some people choose to eat no meat of fish. They believe that is not only better for thei own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss the view and give your own opinion.

Most people argue whether eating only meat or haddock, because

this

gives them a sensation of mental well-being and

also

, the lack of medical issue.

In addition

, they guess how

this

choice benefits each matter in the globe. The reasons why they believe

this

, need to find in the food production process.

For example

, sometimes fish industries could reduce the safety linked to elimination of Eschirichia Coli, a typical food bacteria, and

thus

, in

this

way, they create medical trouble and the consumers think to avoid the problem, not eating fish. The same importance could be found in the level of pollution due to the meat working,

for example

using plastic materials. Some people recognise

this

trouble, but they disagree with the reasons explained, because avoiding eating some specific dishes, they don'

t

solve the situation.

Firstly

, they suggest how it isn'

t

better the use of a single type of animal protein for their own health, in fact, when I went to IFOM, a centre where scientists study the cancer in Milan, the guide explained me how the exclusive consume of red-meat could develop a tumour.

Moreover

, to reduce the level of pollution, they suggest to recycle and

also

approving a new law against the high pollution due to the production process in general, not only in the food industry. Summing up, it isn'

t

useful eat only fish or meat to your well-being, but at the same time, the

developement

act of improving by expanding or enlarging or refining

development

, linked to

this

idea,

doen'

do not

don't

doesn't

t

benefit the world, likely aggravating the complex reality,

furthermore

it

waste

Suggestion

wastes

time with

unuseful

concepts.