The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 avout one university. Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table gives information about the good ratings for some matters of a university, depending on

years

Correct article usage

the years

show examples

. It was possible to get these results,

thank

Correct subject-verb agreement

thanks

show examples

to

Remove the preposition

apply

show examples

different pupil interviews, which they studied there. In fact, the table shows how many students are satisfied

for

Change preposition

with

show examples

every different aspect of their university. During

the

Correct your spelling

this

show examples

time, teaching quality fluctuated from 65% in 2000 to 69% in 2010,

while

Linking Words

print resources

was

Change the verb form

were

show examples

approximately levelled off, with an average proportion of 88 people in 100. As a matter of fact, electronic resources climbed swiftly in the first period and

then

Linking Words

, in the

second

Linking Words

one, the surge was less quick.

Moreover

Linking Words

, building or teaching facilities remained stable with exactly 77

percentages

Replace the word

per cent

show examples

of

well

Change the adverb

good

show examples

preferences. Contrary to

range

Correct article usage

the range

show examples

of modules offered, where between 2000 and 2005, the rate dropped slightly,

in other words

Linking Words

, it lost only 2 percentage points,

while

Linking Words

from 2000 to 2010, it was possible observing a considerable decrease, that was about really 5%.