In many countries, a few people earn very high salaries. Some people think that this is a positive thing for the country. Other people believe that governments should not allow salaries to be over a certain level.

There is a difference of opinion whether a small group of people who earn handsomely seems to have positive implications on the
country
's economy or the governments should allocate salaries that does not exceed beyond a certain level. Before reaching any conclusion, it is important to discuss both sides of the arguments separately. On the one hand, many people concede that having individuals who earn handsomely, can have
positive impact
Suggestion
a positive impact
by
thriving economy
Suggestion
the thriving economy
of the
country
.
This
could be achieved as the
government
embraces
progressive taxing system
Suggestion
a progressive taxing system
, in which the more a person earns, he/she has to pay more tax to the
government
. Those who opine in support of high salaries, cite to
India where
Accept comma addition
India, where
mega movie stars
such
as Salman
khan
a title given to rulers or other important people in Asian countries
Khan
, earn millions of dollars annually. Since the
country
follows effective taxation system
Suggestion
follows, effective taxation system
follows the effective taxation system
follows the effective taxation system the effective taxation system
follows an effective taxation system
, it
aids
make an addition (to); join or combine or unite with others; increase the quality, quantity, size or scope of
adds
them to generate huge
revenues which
Accept comma addition
revenues, which
are
further
used for projects that aims to help
general public
Suggestion
the general public
of India.
On the other hand
, there are many people who believe that the governments should set some fixed limit to the earnings of an
individuals
Suggestion
individual
as it can create disparity in a society. They believe if no limitation is set on the amount earned by individuals, greed could emerge.
As a result
, rich aims to become richer at the expense of poor people. In Pakistan,
for instance
, sugar mill owners are in competition with each other, thereby setting up their own significantly high cost price for sugar. According to the Economist Report 2017,
although
there was an exponential surge in the profits of renowned mill owners
,
Accept space
,
but it has created a huge burden on the poor people of Pakistan. It is reported that they tend to use
this
basic commodity occasionally. In conclusion, I believe that the
government
should set up comprehensive policies, irrespective of how handsomely a person earns.
Consequently
, effective tax collection from the rich would allow the
government
to help alleviate the problems faced by less privileged people of a
country
.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • incentivize
  • discrepancy
  • inequality
  • social cohesion
  • equitable distribution
  • wealth concentration
  • talent retention
  • global competitiveness
  • social unrest
  • innovate
  • government intervention
  • salary cap
What to do next:
Look at other essays: