Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss the two views and give your own opinion.

History

tells about the old civilisations, their strategies, their way of living, world conflict and the ways people overcame it. So I don't agree that

history

has a little to tell us. The basic characteristics, sufferings, crisis and wit are same for all the ages of the human kind. The way people struggled to achieve a better life in the primitive time is very much similar to the present time. The ways may be

different but

Accept comma addition

different, but

the theme is same and there is lots of evidence that the study of past

history

reviles a new invention to the present people. Though it is true that

history

itself is disputed as it has been written by the winners and sometimes

history

differs from place to place.

For example

: according to Indian

History

, English came to rule the country and had destroyed the peaceful

lifestyle there

Accept comma addition

lifestyle, there

by treachery and cunning

strategies but

Accept comma addition

strategies, but

in English

history

the English are heroes and they claim to modernise the Indian. In my opinion,

nonetheless

history

has

it's

of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"

its

invaluable importance to all of us will remain until the end of the human race. How could we know about the great people who had sacrificed their lives for the betterment of the world or those who have cruelly tried to bring suffering for people?

History

tells us a lot about the people of all centuries.

History

suggests the different techniques that can be malevolent or beneficial for a country by presenting practical evidence. Again,

history

tells us about the devastating wars and potentially warns us about the conflict of nations.

History

suggests us about the good and evil and helps us to choose the appropriate way.