Should governments make decisions about people's lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions.

Having lived in two different countries in my life, Switzerland and Turkey, I have most certainly seen a big difference between a strict and lenient

government

. As a direct consequence of these observations, I firmly believe it is absolutely imperative that a

government

decide people's lifestyle. Of the numerous positive aspects of

this

, perhaps the most appealing ones are ensuring public safety,

health

of citizens, and creating balance between people. The

first

substantial benefit of co

untries making d

Accept comma addition

countries, making

ecisions for its population is

establish s

Suggestion

is established

establishes

ecurity of people due to the

fact

that it will prevent people hurting living creatures because they will think twice before putting others in danger as there will be consequences of their actions.

For instance

, if a person has been out, drinking all night and decides to retire for the night, if they know there are legal repercussions of driving while intoxicated, they will choose to get a lift and not put others to dangers. As a matter of

fa

ct my f

Accept comma addition

fact, my

riend recently got into a minor traffic accident while she was drunk and had to pay a fine and her li

sence g

authorize officially

license

licence

ot suspended, so now she swears that she will never drink and drive. Not only is the security of the po

pluluse a

people in general considered as a whole

populace

major factor, but

also

the public's

health

is a crucial benefit inasmuch as people's everyday actions can be detrimental to others

health

and preventing

this

is essential. Preventing people from littering,

for example

, is a very important thing to do. In

fact

, in Switzerland a new law has been passed that states that civilians are no longer allowed to feed pigeons as they carry sicknesses. In ad

dittion t

a component that is added to something to improve it

addition

o security and

health

benefits, creating balance in society is

also

very important, since if there are laws to regulate people's life there won't be sharp distinctions between people. As an illustration, if the

government

ch

oolses p

pick out, select, or choose from a number of alternatives

chooses

eople's job for them, no one would hate each other for belonging to different classes. In

deed in T

Accept comma addition

Indeed, in

urkey there is a big difference between classes and everyone hates the other classes,

this

could be prevented if Turkey's

government

could choose their jobs. In conclusion, after elaborating extensively on the positive, preeminent advantages of public's lifestyle choices being made by governments, including making sure that pu

blic i

Suggestion

the public

s secure, improving

he

alth o

Suggestion

the health

f people, and establishing ba

lance b

Suggestion

a balance

etween classes. I feel it is almost irrefutable that

this

is by far th

e more convenient o

Suggestion

the most convenient

ption. As a matter of

fact

, it is crucial that individuals maximize these undeniable benefits;

otherwise

they may never achieve their ambitions of having a constructive and su

ccesful l

having succeeded or being marked by a favorable outcome

successful

ife. Actually, even though some people still advocate people making their own lifestyle choices, the vast majority fully comprehends the truly significant advantages of governments making the ch

oce.

the person or thing chosen or selected

choice

chase

choices