Some people claim that public museums and art galleries are no longer needed because people can see historical objects and works of art using a computer. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe that physical art galleries and museums are no longer required to learn about history because the

internet

is an excellent resource to learn them

instead

.

This

essay agrees with that statement because to cut the cost, which can use to make people live better and initiate people to use modern technology like computers and the

internet

.

Firstly

, the museum and art galleries require a hefty amount of money for maintenance. Money is needed to clean the relics and

artifacts

a man-made object taken as a whole

artefacts

from time to time, which

also

needs specific expertise. For that matter, authorities have to hire specialists who are trained to maintain those historical pieces of art. I believe that cost can use to improve the infrastructure of the health and education system

instead

, which eventually convenient for the people by and large.

Secondly

, we are living in the era of modern technology where every information is available on the

internet

away from just a click. All knowledge and information about the history one can get in many formats like writing, podcasts to listen, or even videos are readily available. In

this

way, one can not only be informed by the

artifacts

a man-made object taken as a whole

artefacts

of old times as per their

interest but

Accept comma addition

interest, but

also

people will aware of the utility of computers and the

internet

.

For example

, there

is

Suggestion

are

a large number of Picasso paintings available on

youtube

Suggestion

YouTube

to watch and learn. In conclusion, I agree that the museum should be replaced by a virtual knowledge about history to save money and to modernize society.