There has been a long debate whether children should do group study or not. Discuss both views and your opinion.

One of the most prevalent trends in the contemporary world is the cumulative increase in competition among scholars. Some people argue that association discussion is a waste of time and creates differences,

while

others believe that it makes easy-to-understand topics. Both sides of

this

topic will be proven by careful analysis before constructing an inference and I will give my opinion. The primary reason to support why team-based education should be incorporated into the curriculum is that it significantly enhances cooperative skills in students. To illustrate

this

, in a association assessment, the tasks are distributed which eases children’s load, and they learn to work in a team,

consequently

, it would prepare them for their future job in a team-based setting.

Further

to

this

, partnership studies ignite children to generate diverse ideas and opinions as involve more than one brain.

However

,

on the other hand

, sometimes top trainees become enemies of each other

due to

one of them wants to get the top position in the class and it leads to ruins their impending.

In addition

, another factor is that in a crowd study, not all the pupils are brilliant some of them are slow learners, and it becomes very hard to explain them.

For instance

, slow sophomores waste the time of intelligent teens and sharp pupils lose time and concentration.

As a consequence

, it is evident that some great teenagers get low marks in their final exams. In conclusion, following the analysis of both sides,

it is clear that

intelligent teens sometimes feel low from their competitors,

in contrast

, team discussion is always fabulous for peers, so they can have a better prospective.

Further

, it is predicted that studying in the groups is going to continue in the future as well.