Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and the government should encourage businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

It is often argued that the government ought to persuade companies to relocate to the countryside as the issues of traffic congestion and housing are on the rise in urban areas. In my firm conviction, the advantages associated with the above are much stronger than the disadvantages because it promotes rural development of a country to a greater extent. One of the disadvantages of the above is the high employee turnover due to the inability of integrating into the countryside.
In other words
, many employees already well settled in urban areas with their families and they would reluctant to move from their comfort zone.
As a result
, the firm may lose key players, which is largely detrimental to its progress. According to a study conducted in the UK, many firms consider relocation as challenging because it causes many capable employees to resign.
Thus
, it is evident companies would not be able to harness the benefits in the regional areas since a smooth integration is questionable.
On the other hand
, it is observed that rural areas in many countries are underdeveloped due to lack of attention of the government. By encouraging city firms to relocate, infrastructure improvements and increased job opportunities for local community can be attained, which inevitably foster the economic growth of a country.
This
is illustrated by the remarkable economic progression attained by Vietnam in 2015, with the government's decision to shift the apparel industry in cities to a regional zone. They could
also
solve the traffic congestion in cities to a great extent.
Therefore
, it is apparent that shifting of businesses to the regional areas brings stronger benefits,
although
is quite challenging for many firms. To conclude,
although
there are contradicting views on moving businesses to the rural areas, I strongly believe that nations are able to achieve a higher progress as it enhances the underdeveloped regions of the country.
Therefore
, advantages associated with
this
decision are outweighing the disadvantages.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: