Many people believe that exploiting animals by humans unethical. However, another group of people think that to satisfy needs such as food & research is acceptable Discuss both views and give your opinion

Since the inception of life on earth, human beings have been utilizing animals to meet their requirements and

this

has been a controversial topic. Whilst some opine that it is immoral to do so, I would completely agree with those who deem that

this

approach is acceptable.

This

essay will discuss both sides, and explain my belief that it is completely justifiable to use animals. On one side, it is injustice to animals as their life is considered to be of less importance over human.

In contrast

, in many religions

such

as Hindu, and Buddhism animals are considered to be God because they are not things

instead

beings who can feel, touch and see. To exemplify, they can feel pain when medical experiments are conducted on them unsuccessfully and eventually could die of life-threatening diseases. Risking non-human life to benefit from it should not be permissible.

Nevertheless

, it is vital to deploy animals for human requirements of lab experiments and food resources. People could die early from illness, if animals were not used in scientific experiments to find the effective cures as there are no alternatives.

Moreover

, some animal products,

for instance

, milk does not harm animals, but are crucial for survival of human civilization.

Consequently

, it is imperative to depend on animals for health and diet reasons

otherwise

individuals would suffer and starve so it is worth the price paid. In conclusion, even though some think animals should not be eaten or used by researchers and considered equal to mankind, I completely concur with those who believe that animals are quintessential to satiate numerous societal needs.

However

, it should be permissible as long as animals are not tortured for entertainment and in unavoidable circumstances.