Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that the level of artists’ creativity depends on how much

freedom

they are given. Referring to

this

, some argued that these

art

creators should be allowed as much as

freedom

, which I cannot totally agree with. The lack of rules or regulations set on an artist may hinder the stability of a society or even a country. Once given too much space to play around, some artists who hold opposing views against society are likely to show their dissent and dissatisfactions in their paintings, songs, and even the designs of clothes.

For instance

, they may draw graffiti featuring aggressive content on the walls without any fear for

be

Suggestion

of

ing punished so that a stir may be caused. Unhealthy or unfriendly ideas expressed by those artists probably adversely influence the young that lack experience about the world and has not formed a comprehensive wor

ldview. R

egarding the negative impact,

art

people cannot be given unlimited

freedom

.

However

, if

art

workers are controlled too much, their flow of creating things will be impeded resulting in the uniformity of every piece of artwork. Because the loss of

freedom

and increasing boredom in similar works, for the people who aim to choose the profession as artists may lose their int

erests so

Suggestion

interest

that fewer are willing to join the artistic crowd, disabling the production of masterpieces.

This

type of decline in

art

industry ne

Suggestion

the art industry

cessitates the appropriate

freedom

of artists. In conclusion, artists, masters of creating beauty in

this

world, cannot be imposed restrictions on but in the meantime, to prevent the instability of the whole society, they need some rules or even laws to make sure they will not articulate something hazardous.