As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

All lives are important and to value one over another cannot be justified. While, an argument can be made that humans too are part of the ecosystem which follows the principle of 'Survival of the Fittest', we can easily co-exist with other species without creating

unnescessary

not necessary

unnecessary

threats to their existence. For the past few decades, science as a whole has been surmounting one apex after another. Mankind

has been making

Suggestion

has made

wonderful strides in research, especially pertaining to cures of diseases and

cosmotology

the practice of beautifying the face and hair and skin

cosmetology

.

However

, since enormous values have been placed on human lives, it is a mandate that we ensure that these new-found cures are safe for application or

consumption

by humans.

This

is done by subjecting guinea pigs, hamsters, mice and several other animals that even remotely resemble the human genetic sequence

to

Suggestion

of

numerous iterations of the cures and

ennumerate

specify individually

enumerated

tests before

determing

Suggestion

determining

determine

determines

the safety and viability of a cure for human

consumption

. During the course of these tests, we end up slaughtering a large number of animals, testing faulty cures and regimens, all in the name of 'research'.

On the contrary

, science has made leaps so far ahead in one particular field that it might provide a solution for testing these 'cures' and minimizing loss of any type of life. With the ever growing popularity of 3D printers, scientists and doctors

too

in the direction of

to

have started reaping its benefits in saving lives by printing tissues and small organs. The

aforemntioned

being the one previously mentioned or spoken of

aforementioned

research scientists should

also

start reaping similar

benfefits

financial assistance in time of need

benefits

and try to print target human tissues that can be tested upon before it is deemed fit for

consumption

or application by both humans and animals. In conclusion, placing more value on human lives and torturing animals in the name of science is unjustified. I disagree to a great extent that live animal testing is the only way to test a product prior to human

consumption

, and strongly advocate that other avenues of testing

be

Suggestion

is

explored.