In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

It is indeed true that

video

cameras are increasing being used in many metropolitan cities to deter crime. While I accept that surveillance cameras invade our privacy, in my opinion, the benefits of using them to improve security undoubtedly outweigh the demerits. The installation of

video

cameras

at

Suggestion

in

public places certainly leads to the invasion of privacy. They capture each and every moment and as

such

people who are aware of their presence often feel forced to make a conscious effort to conduct themselves respectably when they access public places. While

this

is not a major issue, it can certainly be a nuisance at times. Even so, I would argue that the benefits derived from deploying

video

cameras

at

Suggestion

in

public places are more pronounced than the limitations.

Firstly

, they make public places safer by reducing or even preventing criminal activities.

This

is because being under the constant surveillance of

video

cameras deters both amateur and seasoned criminals from committing crimes. They understand that they are being watched and

this

stops them from doing anything illegal.

For example

, New Zealand, which is one of the most peaceful nations in the world, has considerably reduced the crime rate during

night

Suggestion

the night

by installing

video

cameras at all public places. Of course, increasing police patrolling of streets may

also

help to reduce crime, but cameras have an advantage over human law keepers. Unlike a human police officer, a surveillance camera will not fall asleep or develop fatigue while on duty. In conclusion, the advantages of utilizing / installing

video

cameras to enhance security at public places certainly outweigh the disadvantages.After all, safety is more important than privacy.