A group of people think that the penalty for each kind of crime needs to equal, another group says that before giving punishment wants to analyse the stimulantt and motivation of the crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A group of people think that the penalty for each kind of crime needs to equal, another group says that before giving punishment wants to analyse the stimulation and motivation of the crime. To form a judicious opinion a discussion is essential, where I stand with the
second
group. On the one hand, punishing all faults at the same level without investigating has a few drawbacks. To explain, crimes are increasing at an alarming rate due to unemployment, poverty, and overpopulation. People to fulfil fundamental needs involve in theft and during the violence to protect themselves attack another person, for these minor violations, providing penalty the same as a punishment given for who committed murder is not a reasonable judgment.
Thus
, it is clear fixed penalize has disadvantages.
On the other hand
, giving retribution according to the severity and motivation, protect the people who are innocent and honest. To elaborate, people perform offence in any situation like for money, to protect themselves, subjective vengeance
etcetera
, but all these reasons giving fixed trail affect society.
For instance
, giving the same punishment for robbery and murder like death is not convincing.
Moreover
, the judge wants to evaluate the motivation of felony to prevent penalizing a blameless person.
This
, it is evident providing penalty according to the harshness and the background of the offence is beneficial for the country To conclude, after a discussion I think judgment needs to give the base on provocation and cause of illegal activity. So, I support the
second
party.
Submitted by ajithajesus1st on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: