One of the most prominent
about children’s understanding of
was conducted by Brian Bigelow and John La
in the 1970’s.
is complex and it has different interpretations for different people.
is seen differently in
the younger ones, as they grow older children becomes more complex as well as the meaning of
.
essay will
focus on the
of Bigelow and La
(1975) understanding children’s
as expectations from a best
.
, it will outline the
of their
looking at the
method they used.
, it will attempt to evaluate the usefulness of their
and look at the contemporary
on children’s
.
, it will aim to weigh all the arguments presented and provide a short summary of the points made.
Understanding children’s
is far more complex than just defining what the concept means. The meaning of
in children changes as they grow, the qualities on a search for a
becomes more profound. Bigelow and La
(1975) was the
to conduct
on children’s understanding of
at that time when it was an under-
issue in Psychology. The main focus of Bigelow and La
(1975)
during that time was understanding children’s emotional relationship and what attracts them from one another (Brownlow,
., 2012). To understand the idea a bit more the two researchers looked at the distinction of
on several stages of child development. Younger children rely on parents for support and guidance,
is true on most occasions as parents are their
contact for help and comfort. As Philip Erwin (1988) noted that as children matures the
of
changes. Friends acts as a powerful source of support for them cited in (Brownlow,
., 2012, pp. 240-241). Bigelow and La
(1975) proposed a three-
model of development of
expectations. The
looks at the significance of shared activities
as sports (for boys), the possibility of interacting with each
as hanging out at the park or each other’s houses, so geographically closeness is very important. An example of
can be found on the teenagers discussion on
, one of the teenagers said that he wouldn’t necessarily
with the people he doesn’t see very often so he doesn’t consider them as best mates (The Open University, 2019). The
of
expectations is the
on individual needs
as sharing confidential information about themselves, loyalty and commitment to each other. At
point they were able to make judgement and define the level of
they will have.
The
emphasizes the
of commonness in attitudes, values and interests and the possibility of starting an intimate relationship as well as confiding. Children at
have a very specific criteria in acknowledging a best
. Listening to the teenagers discussion online, teenager 1 said that he wouldn’t necessarily confide in someone who he doesn’t know well enough like someone at college (The Open University, 2019). Obviously, the level of
is different at
point, the best mates are the ones he can confide in and
more often as opposed to the ones that just say hi every now and
. Bigelow and La
’s (1975)
helped gain an insight on understanding what the meaning of
for children really means.
, it supplied evidence regarding the children’s
and how it becomes more complex as they grow older.
Bigelow and La
gaipainformal term for objecting
(1975) used a very different
compared to the previous
studies,
of doing observations or administering questionnaires they collected their data in the form of written essays.
is called Content Analysis which is an
used to examine written, audio and visual
involves identification as well as counting important information that can be used in answering
questions. They collected a large sample of 480 written essays from children (30 girls and 30 boys) between six and fourteen years
upper-working class and lower-middle class homes in Windsor, Ontario, Canada (Brownlow,
., 2012,
. 242). Before they started their
, they came up with a list of twenty-one
expectations.
was done in order to count how many times each expectation was
is
referred to as frequency count (Brownlow,
., 2012, pp. 242-243). Interestingly, Bigelow and La
(1975) found some important differences in the children’s expectations of
. Sixteen out of the original twenty-one expectations were more persistent based on the older children’s description
to the younger ones (Brownlow, 2012,
. 243).
indicates that the children’s expectations of a best
more sophisticated as they mature.
, they were able to compare the children’s written essays to their list and used frequency counts to look for patterns in their data that would be useful in understanding about the changing nature of
in children. Not only that, they were
able to compare the samples in order to see the differences between boys and girls as well as younger and older children.
The
of doing it
way is because children, especially the young ones are able to express themselves better in
form than expressing themselves out loud.
is qualitative in nature.
, the researchers were able to transform the qualitative data into quantitative data through frequency counts (Brownlow, 2012,
. 245). The downside of doing
was that they lost the personal as well as the individual aspect of children’s account that didn’t fit in the category.
, they were able to compare the differences between the groups
as age and gender. They found that in general,
of gender the difference is insignificant.
an organised play boys tend to have more expectations than girls (Brownlow, 2012,
.244). Their decision to transform data from qualitative to quantitative data raised some questions
as using a very large sample and the preservation of the children’s accounts. It is important to remember that they came up with predetermined
expectations that were later used for comparison rather than individualised features.
, they wanted to make generalisations about children’s
and develop a model that could be used in the wider population. It is
possible that there were some expectations that they might have missed
as the influence of culture in children’s expectations of
. One advantage of using
technique is that it illustrates how to transform a large sample of qualitative data to quantitative data using content analysis.
The
of Bigelow and La
(1975) has shown
in understanding the changing nature of
in children through the three-
model of development in
expectations they develop using content analysis. Their contribution to
methods has been very useful and influential because it introduced the concept to the
children’s relationships. Their
children raised some questions on accuracy and
, with the evidence they provided they were able to prove that the purpose of
method was to make
generalisationSuggestion
generalisations
a generalisation
the generalisation
it can be used in a wider population. Weighing the arguments presented their
have been useful at that time of their
despite of the limitations of their
,