will evaluate the
conducted by Bigelow and La
and how useful it is when understanding children's relationships.
Bigelow and La
set out to investigate 'children's understandings of friendship at various stages of development' (Brownlow
pgone side of one leaf (of a book or magazine or newspaper or letter etc.) or the written or pictorial matter it contains
242). It is important to consider that at the point of investigation (1975) there was very little known about children's friendships, as the focus of
was mostly on emotional relationships and what things attract people to
another. In order to conduct their
, Bigelow and La
created a means of investigating the changes in a
interpretation of friendship as they grew older. In order to do
, they asked
to think about their best
of the same
and to write an
on what they expected of their best
and how
might differ from what they expect from other people. Bigelow and La
collected 480 essays written
children aged six and fourteen years old, who were in upper-middle to lower-middle-class homes in Canada, they collected from eight different schools with an even mix of thirty boys and thirty girls from each. Before conducting their
, Bigelow and La
created a list of different characteristics that they assumed children might want to include when writing their essays,
as 'sharing common activities, engaging in organised play, admiration, loyalty and commitment, genuineness, and similarity in attitudes and values' (Brownlow
pgone side of one leaf (of a book or magazine or newspaper or letter etc.) or the written or pictorial matter it contains
242-243). These were
used when analysing each
. They used content analysis when comparing said results and found 16 of the 21 expectations to be more frequent in the older
childrensa young person of either sex
essays.
was suggested to mean that as children get older the expectations of their best friends get more complex.
with, the
of selecting the
, as well as the
of the
has some advantages and disadvantages. The advantage of choosing
a large
is through the increased accuracy in mean values, and the smaller margin for error. Another advantage of having a large
is that
that might end up skewing a smaller
sizes' results can be identified.
, there were
issues
how they chose their
.
,
issue apparent with the
conducted is through only choosing children coming from upper-middle and lower-middle-class families in Canada.
could
lead to a sampling error, due to the
that children from other classes were not included when researching and so it would be unknown whether their findings would remain true for all types of
class, or if there would be changes. Another issue with the
used is the
that all participants were from Canada.
can be seen as a disadvantage as Bigelow and La
are unable to show whether culture may impact children's understanding of friendship, due to the
that all children used were from the same - Western - culture.
, it can be argued that while Bigelow and La GaIpas'
is useful when considering Western, middle-class children and their expectations with relationships, it is not so useful when considering other cultures and classes.
,
clear advantage of the
and
used is the
difference observed. Because the children were asked to write about a
of the same
, there could be a comparison made between male-male friendships and female-female friendships.
the findings on
difference were rather minimal, the
is still useful as it leads to people being able to draw data for both genders,
of only being able to use data for
and drawing estimations and assumptions for the other, which could end up being inaccurate.
Another way in which Bigelow and La Gaipas
might not be as useful is through the usage of writing an
.
is because it can be argued that the younger participants might not have had the written skills needed to be able to write an
describing the expectations of their best
.
remains useful when considering older children - as largely they would have had the written skills needed- it can be argued that the results for the younger participants might not be wholly accurate, and
not as useful, as results from another type of
of collecting data.
,
way in which Bigelow and La Gaipas
is useful is through the
that it was the
of its type. As mentioned before, in the 70s'
regarding relationships focused on emotional relationships, so, though Bigelow and La Gaipas experiment, they opened up
idea for discussion, and brought attention to something that had previously been unknown to psychology.
, through the large age range of the participants, it allowed showed how children regarded friendships at different ages and
allowed for