Advanced medical treatments are generally expensive. People’s access to proper health care should not depend upon their level of income. All people have the right to access the best medicine available. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It goes without saying that
health
care
is one of the most important issues.
Nevertheless
, modern medical services are costly and seem to be far reaching from the poor. There are those who argue that
this
trend is inevitable and there is no need to go
further
. From my point of view, everybody deserves to be treated equally in all circumstances. Whether or not people have the
right
to
access
the best medical treatments has been a hotly debated issue. There are those who argue that advanced medical treatments are absolutely exorbitant for the poor. Some others do not agree with
this
viewpoint. To my mind, it is essential for the poor to
access
cutting-edge medical treatments by making a dramatic
price
reduction. The advancement of medical treatments becomes an integral part of people’s life to recover the
health
of unwell patients. While it is true that these development methods require a significant
amount
of
money
that un-wealthy people cannot afford to use, I believe that people have the
right
to use expensive
health
services without concerning about their properties. It has been undeniable that cutting-edge technology for
health
care
is absolutely exorbitant. Some people argue that the package of service relies on patients’ earnings.
However
, it seems to me that the advancement of medical
treatment
should be equally accessible to everybody. In more recent decades, the issue of whether the same quality of
healthcare
Suggestion
health care
and
treatment
should be provided to every resident has remained a matter for debate.
This
essay will explain why the idea mentioned above should not be brought into reality. Due to the surge in the cost of medicines and other medical services, many poor people are not able to take
treatment
even for their major ailments.In
this
essay I am going to agree with the opinion that medical interventions should be implemented not according to the public's
level
of income.
Moreover
, all human being has the
right
to get the best medicines available now. It is evident that in many undeveloped and developing societies, the
level
of people who cannot
access
the advanced medical treatments is very high. The obstacles are many: lack of medical experts, unavailability of advanced technology, exorbitant fees.
Consequently
, the trend, in which just people who are rich can approach to the best medical treatments appear to be an undesirable norm in these areas.
However
,
this
is not true for all parts of the world and wherever possible, people should struggle to prevent the negative process. One of the feasible measures should be for the governments to take the lead in ensuring all of civilians have chance to be treated with suitable medical services equally. Investing in public
healthcare
,
for
example
, which give free charge for all of disadvantaged people should be implemented. By doing
this
, the pressure of people’
health
problems could be decreased.
In addition
, people who have, the more lucky prosperity should
also
take part in the campaign in improving
health
for vulnerable individuals.
For
example
, there are many un-profit organizations which Is managed to help poor and disabled people in many areas in terms of
health
care
and living conditions.
As a result
, it is well-know that, the scale of people suffering from common disease in all parts of the world has declined significantly for the couple of decades.
To begin
with, there would be much more pressure, putting on the
healthcare
system if all individuals had
access
to the most advanced medical treatments. To take the National
Health
Service in the United Kingdom as a classic
example
, the state hospitals are difficult to run in spite of their extreme efforts, because they always have very long waiting lists for operations and appointments. As an inevitable consequence, a lot of people may suffer from slow
treatment
.
This
example
illustrates the current situation in which patients are being equally treated with the latest remedies. Another
reason
is that
such
ideal policy which guarantees with the adequate
health
services may constrain the national development.
First
, because the
government
must invest a large
amount
of the tax
money
in
healthcare
Suggestion
health care
, other areas
such
as education and the environment will suffer from cutbacks.
Second
, people may take the welfare state for granted, so they do not have to work hard, but still be able to enjoy a reasonable quality of lives. In these ways, giving out the same
level
of
treatment
to every patient is capable of damaging the economy.
First
of all, all patients need treating equally in the
field
of
medicine
. It is impossible for people who are unskilled workers with low and medium
level
of incomes to approach the best medical
care
. If the medical branch continues to maintain the high
price
of advanced medical
care
, the poor will deal with a wide range of financial pressures. What is more, the greatest achievements of
medicine
must be for all people even thought these people are not affordable. More importantly, for the purpose of
medicine
, all diseases are cured by the best medical measurements; poor patients have the
right
to enjoy the most advanced medical treatments in the hospitals because
this
make sure that it is fair as well as humanistic. Another
reason
is that more and more poor persons have been taken serious diseases. These diseases are required to have an advanced medical
treatment
and the patients are likely to die in the case of lacking
this
special medical service. Obviously, it is unacceptable to admit that patients die because of lacking
money
to
access
to the advancement of medical
care
in modern society.
Moreover
, the
first
priority of
treatment
is that the poor must be examined and cured with the best medical
care
because
this
reflects the process of humanitarian of the country. It seems to me that all significant medical achievements of the medical
field
need to remain the lowest
price
for manual workers with the lowest income to
access
to. What
government
to do is to support a large
amount
of
money
for hospitals to decrease the
price
of special medical
care
.
This
is regarded as an important criterion of humanitarian.
To begin
with, low-income populations highly unlikely to be served advanced medical treatments for some clear reasons. The
first
reason
would be that due to wasting huge
amount
of
money
, the
government
may not subsidize
this
money
for their citizens. To illustrate,
government
could invest in other key issues
such
as educational systems, military force and agriculture. Another
reason
for
this
view is that citizens may not take good
care
of their
health
.
For
example
, my friend who is German does not pay much attention to
care
her stomach
instead
of eating in certain time because she could be examined and provided free medicines anytime by using her
health
care
.
However
, it is indisputable that all citizens should have the same
right
to receive good
health
services from the
government
.
First
and foremost, residents have paid taxes to contribute to their nations, which allows them to have good services to protect their life. As a consequence, citizens may be willing to pay taxes to earn a good living in the future.
Furthermore
, the
government
could support all citizens to treat their illnesses, which reduces the gap between poverty and well-offs.
Therefore
, the society could be balanced and developed. As for the medical
field
, all patients need treating equally under any circumstances.
Firstly
, the mission of every hospital is to try their best to save the patients. The advanced medical measurement should be taken to those who are in life-threatening conditions.
In addition
, treating medication fairly for either wealthy or poor people is regarded as an important criterion of humanitarian. Particularly, medical moral of the doctors are not allowed them to discriminate their patients while taking
treatment
.
Furthermore
, low or medium class has been taken more serious diseases than the high class due to lack of hygiene facilities, knowledgeable
health
care
information or financial problems to consult the good doctors. As we know,
however
, the advanced medical
treatment
is pricey and it is affordable for the affluent not the needy.
For
example
, 20 percent of poor people in India die every year because of insufficient income to pay for the expensive
treatment
at the hospital. In current medical sector, there have been huge developments taking place by inventing new-new
treatment
methods. Some of the new modes of treatments
such
as bio-technology, genetic engineering are the best examples of these and many more experiments are carried out daily in the
field
of
medicine
.But majority of these advanced treatments are only afforded by financially sound citizens.When it comes to a large proportion of poor people
,
Accept space
,
these technologies become futile.In many developing countries
,
Accept space
,
poor people are dying of cancers and other major diseases due to the lack of treatments day by day.
For instance
, Chemotherapy and surgical procedures have become much more costly than before. The present condition should change in the
field
of medical
treatment
in a way that all people do
access
the ultimate mode of
treatment
independent of their financial status.Some suggestions can be put forward to make it happen.
Firstly
the
government
should take serious concern in
this
matter and provide these treatments to the poor in a very convenient way. One other thing is that, by initiating an insurance for all people and provide medical needs as many developing countries do.By
this
way we can save many poor families from getting poorer.Medical insurance should be mandatory for all citizens in the country can bring a serious outcome in providing better treatments equally among the public. Overall, in my opinion, the
right
if accessing to appropriate treatments should be granted to everybody by the cooperating of not only governments but
also
individuals. In conclusion,
although
the advent of medical methods is expensive to prevent the
government
from sponsoring all their residents without mentioning their social status to some extent, I would argue that
government
should spend
money
in
this
sector to help their people from poor families to rich ones. In conclusion, the
right
to
access
the appropriate
medicine
should be reserved to any patient regardless of their budget.
Government
and related agencies should raise funds or take action to assist the poor with the best medical
care
as much as the wealthy can. In a nutshell, as a civilian all people have the
right
to
treatment
irrespective of their financial status. To make it happen
,
Accept space
,
the authority should take better initiatives and make our country free from all sorts of diseases in the coming future.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: