Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organisations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I believe that the official authorities who run the democracy should pay more attention to scientific exploration and their development. Scientific
research
are roots of any
country
to grow in all the means. The reason behind it is because when scientific
research
will grow, they shall get new technology which will make our
country
not only famous but earn from its discoveries. Surely scientific
research
will need financial support in order to make various findings. But many a times it is noticed that the government sponsors more on other ancillary things than on scientific
research
. The accountability of the official authorities does not end by only financing but
also
taking an initiative to regulate the scientific
research
. Giving more importance to scientific investigation than the individuals is indeed a need of an hour.
This
is perhaps only because of the growing competition. According to me the private institutions do not actually require sponsorships from the government as the benefit of their growth is limited to themselves at times.
Moreover
, these firms are already supported by many of the individual partners. I think that in
this
kind of competitive world every nation should be answerable for funding and controlling scientific
research
as once the scientific
research
grows
subsequently
the income at the national level of each
country
shall increase. I opine that to lead someone or some tribe, the
country
will have to pay more attention towards their accountability for funding and regulating the scientific
research
.
Therefore
, to recapitulate the individual offices will not make much difference in uplifting the nation. But certainly if the scientific
research
is supported and managed in a good manner,
then
that nation can lead other nations who will
then
follow them for growing.
Submitted by dhwanikapatel22 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • equitable access
  • public good
  • prioritize
  • environmental conservation
  • public health
  • bureaucratic inefficiencies
  • stifle innovation
  • profit motives
  • enhance efficiency
  • rapid advancements
  • combined approach
  • stable funding
  • ethical standards
What to do next:
Look at other essays: