When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Immense technological progress pushes society to

next level

Suggestion

the next level

, so it increases effectiveness, efficiency and mobility of all walks of

life

. Some traditional industries, out-fashioned skills and ways of living and all sorts of archaic things are quoted as outdated. Some people

comment

Suggestion

have commented

these stuff is valueless to keep alive and should be thrown away. I definitely disagree with

this

statement and illustrate with reasons.

Firstly

, traditional skills were outdated because innovative

products

Suggestion

product

replacement makes people apply new skills and techniques.

For example

, in the 1960s, many factory workers made toys by hands. Nowadays, they put

materials

Suggestion

the materials

into a big machine and

then

a new product come out. Those handmade skills were important in the old days and it might not be applicable recently, but these handcraft techniques could be transformed to new industry.

For instance

, those ‘masters’ can teach their skills in class and make it as an interest for the public. Alternative industry not only saves the

life

of old

skills but

Accept comma addition

skills, but

also

fosters a new industry which may boost economy.

Secondly

, traditional ways of

life

are part of our history and culture, why not put it as historical properties in

museum

Suggestion

a museum

or demonstrate to tourists after repackaging? History is an important subject in education, so old ways of

life

should not be abandoned. In my opinion, enormous technological influences make our lives fruitful and

satisfactory

Suggestion

satisfying

.

However

, we should not forget the traditional skills and ways of

life

which accumulated historical values, cultural backgrounds and past good memories.