Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.

Parents throughout the world place spend time reading with their offspring to prepare them for school where their literacy skills are

further

developed;

however

, recent research suggests that focusing on reading at an early age can be detrimental, and participating in fun activities would be far more beneficial. I am a strong advocate of

this

approach, and the benefits of it will be covered in

this

essay. A fundamental reason for

this

is that there is no biological age for reading, and pushing infants to acquire

this

skill before they are ready could have repercussions.

For example

, in the UK, many boys are reluctant readers, possibly because of being forced to read, and

this

turned them off reading. By focusing on other activities and developing other skills

such

as creativity and imagination, when they are ready to read, they usually acquire

this

skill rapidly.

In addition

, the importance of encouraging creativity and developing a child’s imagination must be acknowledged. Through play, youngsters develop social and cognitive skills,

for example

, they are more likely to learn vocabulary through context rather than learning it from a book.

Furthermore

, play allows youngsters to mature emotionally, and gain self-confidence. There is no scientific research which suggests reading at a young age is essential for a child’s development,

moreover

, evidence suggests the reverse is true. In Finland, early years’ education focuses on playing. Reading is only encouraged if a child shows and interest in developing

this

skill.

This

self-directed approach certainly does not result in Finnish school leavers falling behind their foreign counterparts. In fact, Finland was ranked the sixth best in the world in terms of reading. To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons.

Therefore

, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on

this

subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of

this

, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.