Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing a game is fun only when you win. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is often argued that winning games are the key and the only way to bring satisfaction to the players. In my opinion, I completely disagree that games are only enjoyable in a winning situation. On one hand, there are a

lot

of types of games that only purpose is only to achieve the highest score.

In other words

, it is practically hard to determine a winner for these games.

Although

, sometimes people will play with friends and compare which one had the highest score among each other.

However

, these situations do not happen everyday and people still enjoy playing with themselves.

For example

, Tetris which is popular among many old players and even some youngsters. Tetris is a simple

game

which only requires each player to gain as many points as possible. Compare each score among players are only optional and without that feature the

game

is still pretty much fun to play.

Thus

, there are various fun games that are not purposely for winning but only for entertainment.

On the other hand

, even when losing, a competitive

game

could

also

bring pleasure. The thrilled and competition brings determination to improve with every

game

. It cannot be denied that some gamers will feel desperate with each loss.

Nevertheless

, the enjoy of games not only come from the satisfaction of winning, but from every interaction made and development gained on every

game

.

For instance

, the most played games in the

last

decade, DOTA 2, still bring a

lot

of newbies. Even though the

game

is over 10 years and have a

lot

of professionals, the new players still find it enjoyable. That's why the determination of fun in games cannot be measured only by winning. In conclusion, games are an entertainment that could bring joy even if the players could not become the champion because there are a

lot

factors to get the excitement.