Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

I think that a creative

artist

should be open to show their

feels

the petals or sepals of a flower that bend downward (especially the outer perianth of an iris)

falls

and whatever he or she wants to express.

This

because I believe that writers, painters, musicians can create a better job if they have the freedom to say anything. So for

this

reason I agree with that the State should no putting restriction to

artist

Suggestion

the artist

.

Otherwise

, if the government would control the art, perhaps many artworks couldn’t see the light, due to

artist

sometimes make their work for criticism the system. For

instead

, in Chile the group of music “Los Prisioneros” written a lot of their songs in Pinochet’s dictatorship,

Then wheter

Accept comma addition

Then, whether

Then whether

the State has had control of the art, maybe

this

music wouldn’t exist.

On the other hand

, I think that the government shouldn’t support creative artists, because if there is money, they feel with the right to control them.

This

is sad, because in general being an

artist

means

live

Suggestion

living

with few thins, but I am sure that

this

will happen if the art is financed

for

Suggestion

from

the State. To conclude, artists should feel freedom to show whatever they want, because their profession consists in open other minds. The

artist

are experts on express in an implicit way, what is the worse

of

Suggestion

for

the society, so

this

always be annoying for government.