Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

With growing population size, there is an increasing utilization of

land

for human use in the form of cultivation, housing and the factories, but at the expense of the natural habitat of the animals. One opinion is in favour of priority to the human beings, while others think that the

land

to be saved for survival of animal species that are on the verge of extinction. I think a balanced approach is required to cater for both the important issues. The progression in the construction is leading to the elimination of forests and water pools,

such

that, the environment is becoming difficult for the survival of the fauna.

For example

, the Panda is about to disappear from the globe,

as a result

of man made encroachments. Many other animals have already vanished from the earth.

Such

a trend has negative implications for the ecosystems, which,

consequently will

Accept comma addition

consequently, will

produce unfavourable outcomes for the human beings, as they are dependent on the ecosystems for their survival.

However

,

this

aspect can be managed by effective planning and moulding the human requirements and specifying the areas for animals.

Thus

, a co-existence of both the needs looks a possibility. The mankind requirements are

also

on the rise due to increase in population size and awareness about new lifestyles.

Moreover

, there are enhanced expansion of factories and businesses. These all are now the essential elements of today's living.

For instance

, more and more residential units are the necessities and the same is the case with the production units.

Furthermore

,

land

utilization for making large farm houses is getting trend and it is a luxurious pattern.

This

means many of the recent uses are important.

However

, luxuries should be curtailed in favour of

land

safety for other living beings. In conclusion, the

land

use for residential purposes and progression is justified, but there is a need of curb on utilization for extra comfort at the expense of animal life.