In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict their individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

There is an increase in
use
Suggestion
the use
of
video
surveillance in many cities while people criticise that it reduces their privacy. I personally believe that the merits of
video
cameras are more in comparison to demerits because it helps in the detection of criminals and protection of
property
. To initiate with, the burglars and thefts are easily caught by the
use
of security measures in public sectors as digital cameras continuously monitor each and every activity in the area of approach.
For instance
, pickpockets and shoplifters are less likely to operate in those regions where they know that they are being watched.
As a result
,
video
cameras provide valuable support with material evidence to police officers to catch and prosecute offenders which will lead to the
safety
of cities. Probing
further
, security measures play an important role in the
safety
procedures of
property
as
video
camera surveillance helps in keeping a check on the everyday activities happening in that particular area. To illustrate, nowadays every educational institution, hospitals and other businesses sectors
use
this
approach of
safety
to a large extent in order to take care of their
property
. Effectively, people can go anywhere, far from their homes, without taking tension of their belongings. On the flip side, the personal liberty of individuals is influenced by the
use
of
video
surveillance because people think that they are constantly being watched by the authorities and their every moment is captured. To exemplify, A report published by "THE TRIBUNE" on 14th March 2018 revealed that more than 70% of the job employees is fed up due to these
safety
concerns.
Subsequently
, it curtails the freedom of people, that's made them feel unsecured and
also
workers are not able to enjoy their leisure time properly. To recapitulate, it seems that we gain more from the CCTV invention as it controls the rate of delinquency as well as protect our confidential
property
than the lose from the enhanced security.
Submitted by harmanj813 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: