Some people think that you can never become fluent in a language unless you have spent time living or working in that country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

One's linguistic mastery is no one-dimensional matter. While accustoming oneself to a
language
is widely regarded as pivotal, debates arise whether prospecting multi-linguists should go to as extreme
of
Suggestion
to
lengths as visiting the
language
's origins to achieve true fluency. In spite of its indisputable advantages, I am against the notion of resorting to
such
measures as a fixed prerequisite.
To begin
with, statements acknowledging the merits of residing in a country on an individual's linguistic proficiency are indeed indisputable. In an environment which inhibits one to use their native
language
, said individuals have no choice but to exclusively utilize the
language
relevant in the country consistently. Many researches confirmed prolonged exercise of a skill done consistently enough leads to substantial improvement of said skill - and
this
includes linguistic proficiency.
However
, other simpler means of acclimatization
also
exist. With the rapid availability of the Internet to the greater mass, being up to date with the world's affairs has never been easier. Local news and entertainment media (e.g., movies and songs) made in foreign languages have
also
been entertainment media to the global audience - an opportunity countless polyglot has taken advantage of. While the utilization of
such
media has varying degree of success, it is unarguably cheaper and
subsequently
more accessible to individuals other than the elites and elitists.
In other words
, utilizing and familiarizing oneself to a
language
consistently via the omni-accessible Internet can serve as a cheaper and equal alternative to
prolongedly
residing in said
language
's home country.
Nevertheless
, dismissing either as being invalid means of improving one's fluency would be detrimentally unwise.
Submitted by bernardlesleyefendy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: