Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, there are many kinds of sports playing in world,

however

, few of them are really dangerous to play and due to

this

reason, some people believe that, the government should ban, but others claim that, nobody should

interfere people’s

Suggestion

interfere with people’s

interfere in people’s

life. In

this

essay, I am going to demonstrate

pros

Suggestion

the pros

and cons of

this

phenomenon On the one hand, supporters of idea, severely required that, the government must impose bans and restricted to dangerous sports.

Firstly

, playing these extreme sports can cause some serious injuries and

also

could lead to death. More specifically, games

such

as boxing, racing, and others could be very dangerous since they are extremely risky and due to a single mistake, brain cells of competitors could be damaged and they can live crippled in their rest of life.

Besides

this

, in some cases, spectators can

also

be injured in

this

type of competition.

For example

: 2 years ago, in the Monaco grand prix a race car brakes and due to

this

accident car crushed with spectators.

On the other hand

, no one could interfere people’s private life since everybody can decide for themselves whether to take part in a number of dangerous non-sport activities. Due to the human nature, mankind

always have

Suggestion

always has

has always had

an inclination

to

Suggestion

for

of

doing prohibited things and it

is nearly impossible deter

Suggestion

is nearly impossible deterring

is nearly impossible deterred

has nearly impossible deterred

deters nearly impossible

is nearly impossible to deter

is nearly impossible deter

it. Except

this

, in

this

century, due to the advancements of technology, dangerous activities are safer, in comparison with past because so many equipment are available for providing people with security. In my opinion, I reckon that

although

many risks have been anticipated but there are more advantages when the government let people practice what they like