Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Constant evolution of modern working culture and environment has initiated various arguments, like some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly.

On the other hand

, others

value quality

Accept comma addition

value, quality

of

work

above appearance. In

this

essay, I will discuss both

side

Suggestion

sides

of the argument and provide my support for the latter view.

Firstly

, while working in professional

environment some

Accept comma addition

environment, some

organisations expect their employees to be well-dressed. Though, dressing tidy can make a person appear more presentable and professional, but it should not be a mandatory practice.

For example

, wearing a white cloak to

work

in Dubai is considered elegant, but it will appear inappropriate in

other

any of various alternatives; some other

another

part of the globe. In

this

multicultural environment, people can wear regional professional attire to

work

,

organisation

Suggestion

the organisation

organisations

an organisation

can differ from it which can hurt their sentiments and deplete their performance. To illustrate it

further

, car market leader Maruti made the dress compulsory in 1988, it initiated distress among workers, eventually causing a 30-day strike leading to huge losses.

First

and foremost, evolution of technology had reduced the physical human interaction. Presently, conducting

meeting

Suggestion

meetings

a meeting

the meeting

, discussions, briefings can be done from anywhere which makes being well dressed insignificant. What should be most valued is the talent, skills and quality of

work

by

Suggestion

of

an individual.

For example

, Founder of Facebook, Mr. Mark Zuckerberg is known for development in social networking technology, not for what he wears every day at

office

Suggestion

the office

. Employees should be valued for their interpersonal skills, practical knowledge, contribution towards the organisational goal.

For instance

, former president of India Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was an average dressing

person but

Accept comma addition

person, but

he is remembered for his contribution towards missile technology. In conclusion, whereas many will argue that being well dressed can make employees look more presentable and

professional but

Accept comma addition

professional, but

as discussed above it can lead to distress among them. In my view,

quality

Suggestion

the quality

of

work

over appearance is always principal and it should always be valued above someone’s attire.