Animal testing for cosmetic should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Before 1938, there was no technique or law to regulate the safety of cosmetic, so that animal experimentation was used as an effective way to test and determine the

safety

Suggestion

Safety

of products before the cosmetic was sold. According to Human Society International (2013), two hundred and thousand animals have to endure pain and death just for cosmetic every year around the world. The issue of making

this

Linking Words

method illegal still is a subject of much controversy.​ From my perspective, it is essential that animal experimentation should be prohibited globally since it is unethical and dispensable.

Firstly

Linking Words

, the advocate of

this

Linking Words

experimentation would argue that cosmetic products have to meet specific functions and requirements on beauty improvement; and due to the similar structure of animal with human body, they are supposed to be the most optimal test subjects that can firmly ensure the safety standard of production.

This

Linking Words

point seems to have certain surface values.

However

Linking Words

, on a thorough examination, it is nothing but a mere discrimination against the accuracy and legitimacy of

this

Linking Words

approach. The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) both indicates that

this

Linking Words

method is poor scientific practice and can be erroneous owing to its misleading animal models and obsolete technique.

Moreover

Linking Words

, with the cutting-edge technology, alternative experiments are currently developing to examine the ingredient in makeup production rather than these unnecessary and poisoning tests. Some advanced and practical solutions for

this

Linking Words

issue were shown by Maxwell, et al.

(

Accept space

(

2008)

such

Linking Words

as “ Chemical Reactivity; Peptide Reactivity; Epidermal Disposition/Tissue Bio availability; Epi -dermal Inflammation; DC activation and T-cell proliferation “.

Besides

Linking Words

this

Linking Words

, Drs. MacLennan and Amos in “Cosmetics and Toiletries

,

Accept space

,

Manufacturers and Suppliers”

also

Linking Words

invalidate the feasibility to correlate data from animal to human by virtue of their fundamental differences. Because of these reasons, cosmetic companies and brands should entirely adopt non-animal methods for their

produce

Suggestion

Produce

progress.

Secondly

Linking Words

, the opponents of banning animal testing

also

Linking Words

maintain that some species

infrahuman

Suggestion

Infrahuman

may not have strong feelings and emotion like humans because of the

lacking

Suggestion

Lacking

in consciousness. While it is true that animal is made anaesthesia during testing progress, it is hardly acceptable that they still have to suffer from toxic chemicals and serious diseases, which can lead to day-to-day damaged organ system before they ultimately die. A

further

Linking Words

research found that with a view to guarantee each particular function of products, animal

are usually interfected

Suggestion

is usually interested

are usually interested

are usually intersected

are usually interfaced

by heavy metals, skin burned, maimed, brain damage, blinded and other invasive procedures in these lethal experimentations.

(

Accept space

(

Act, Tenneriello, Koppisch, & Fagan, 2014).

Furthermore

Linking Words

, these unreliable tests are evaluated to be barbaric and inhumane

since

Suggestion

for

their primary purpose merely for appearance improvement. As the research of

Human

Suggestion

Humane

Society International (2013) mentioned above, millions animals are slaughtered each year just to create huge profits for cosmetic companies. Because of all the injury that living creatures have to undergo, these cruel experiments should be limited. Nowadays, both citizens and government have to take legal actions to restrict

this

Linking Words

kind of experiment in order to protect the survival of the animal.

For instance

Linking Words

, a large number of countries, especially in the EU, laid down some rules that prohibit on the sale and transport of cosmetics animal-tested in 2013.

In addition

Linking Words

, consumers of cosmetic should purchase cruelty-free products like: Lush, Cosrx or The body shop in order to encourage many alternative methods that science has to offer. By means of conclusion, government should combine with cosmetic companies to put an end to these cruel experiments. It is widely believed that animal tests should be performed just in

case scientists

Accept comma addition

case, scientists

have no alternative choices and for medical purposes.

This

Linking Words

method needs to be banned widely to partly guarantee the survival of species.