It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, it is no longer a problem for the human race to explore even the most distant areas of the world

such

as the South Pole.

However

, I believe that there are significantly more disadvantages of

this

development than advantages.

To begin

with, travelling to

unpopulated

and isolated areas is newer and more interesting.

That is

to say, now it is too common to travel to other countries and cities which means that individuals might find it to be more appealing to travel to places

such

as the South Pole or Amazon. As well as that,

this

development is likely to cause news in terms of science, as

scientists can

Accept comma addition

scientists, can

study rare species of animals

such

as white bears more closely and

therefore

invest in biology.

On the other hand

, there are obvious drawbacks.

First

of all,

this

trend can adversely affect travellers' health. Since they are not adequately prepared for their trip, they might be exposed to situations like low temperature or even be attacked by local animals which is extremely dangerous for their lives.

Besides

, those individuals might have a negative effect on the surroundings they attend. Most of them decide to reside there or start their

business thereby

Accept comma addition

business, thereby

causing major natural problems

such

as massive deforestation or contamination. Due to their inadequate environmental awareness,

such

environments may even disappear. To sum up, while being enjoyable, travelling to remote places might be risky.

Nonetheless

, personally I assume that drawbacks of

this

tendency are by far more that the benefits.