Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is true that some

minortiy

a group of people who differ racially or politically from a larger group of which it is a part

minority

languages may disappear in the near future.

Although

it can be argued that governments could save

money

by allowing

this

to

happehn

come to pass

happen

, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved. There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of

money

.

Fisrlty

Suggestion

Firstly

, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing.

This

momney

the most common medium of exchange; functions as legal tender

money

might be better spent on other public services.

Secondly

, it

wopuld

past tense of "will"

would

be much cheaper and more

effiecient

being effective without wasting time or effort or expense

efficient

fro

countires

a politically organized body of people under a single government

countries

counties

counters

to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to

communicting

the activity of communicating; the activity of conveying information

communicating

connecting

with each

minorty

a group of people who differ racially or politically from a larger group of which it is a part

minority

group. Despite the

abover

at a higher position than

above

arguments, I

beli

shout loudly and without restraint

bellow

blew

value

,

Accept space

,

eve that

governmenets

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

governments

government

should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is öuch more than simply a mea of communication. It has

vital connection

Suggestion

a vital connection

with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If

alanguage

Suggestion

a language

disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the

ri

the syllable naming the second (supertonic) note of any major scale in solmization

re

,

Accept space

,

ch

(used of count nouns) every one considered individually

each

cultural diversity that makes societies more

ientersting

arousing or holding the attention

interesting

. By spending

money

to protect

minortyi

a group of people who differ racially or politically from a larger group of which it is a part

minority

languages, governments can

also

preserve

tadeitions

an inherited pattern of thought or action

traditions

, customs and behaviours that are part of a

counrty's

(United Kingdom) a region created by territorial division for the purpose of local government

county

history. In conclusion, it may save

money

in the

sort

the location on a baseball field where the shortstop is stationed

short

term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term

this

would have an extremöely negative impact on our cultural heritageç.