Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

One school of thoughts reckons that territory should be forbidden to save the morality of civilization.
On the contrary
, there is a counter argument among people that restricting travel is worthless, which have no merits. I am going to scrutinize on both aspects before forming an opinion in the
last
. Protagonists of the
first
viewpoint maintain that tourism leads to demolishing the value of local perception.
Firstly
, people interact with the sight-seekers and they exchange their novel ideas, thoughts, views with each other.
Thus
, local masses attract to other's practice's background and they adapt the rules and regulations of other religions.
For instance
, a Hindus excuse to the other nations,
such
as America, UK, at there they get influence from the customs of christian religion.
Consequently
, some individuals forget the value of their fashion, which results to the bad influence on their upcoming generations. Proponents of the
second
viewpoint contend that, it is not necessary to ban the tourism.
First
of all, economic growth of any nation depending upon
touristry
sector. As, it is the greatest source of revenue, some specific historical museums and buildings plays a significant role to contribute the enormous amount of revenue to governments.
For example
, Taj Mahal has become the most promising visiting place in India, as well as, holidaymakers spends vast of money on accommodations at there.
Moreover
, banning the tourism would lead to the loss of the myriad jobs for those employers, who is working in hotel and hospitality managements.
As a result
, it would lead to the down-fall of economic growth of the nation. To recapitulate, in my point of view, abolishing the
touristry
a region marked off for administrative or other purposes
territory
tapestry
is not suitable method, because it would foster to economic loss for countries.
However
, to encourage people towards their custom, bureaucrats should campaign through social media about the moral value of local experience.
Submitted by GURPAL SINGH on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: